You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Make t the subject of the formula
p=(3-2t)/(4+t)
The left hand side was given in the traditional fraction form, with numerator on top of denominator; this is just the same, yeah, with the slash?
Here's my attempt;
Step 1
Mult.both sides by 4+t;
p(4+t)=3-2t
Step 2
Expand brackets;
4p+pt=3-2t
Step 3
Sub.4p from both sides;
pt=3-2t-4p
Step 4
Add 2t to both sides;
pt+2t=3-4p
Step 5
Factorise left side;
t(p+2)=3-4p
Step 6
Divide both sides by (p+2);
t=3-4p/p+2
Last edited by paulb203 (2023-11-20 06:23:28)
Prioritise. Persevere. No pain, no gain.
Offline
Make t the subject of the formula
p=(3-2t)/(4+t)
The left hand side was given in the traditional fraction form, with numerator on top of denominator; this is just the same, yeah, with the slash?
Here's my attempt;
Step 1
Mult.both sides by 4+t;
p(4+t)=3-2t
Step 2
Expand brackets;
4p+pt=3-2t
Step 3
Sub.4p from both sides;
pt=3-2t-4p
Step 4
Add 2t to both sides;
pt+2t=3-4p
Step 5
Factorise left side;
t(p+2)=3-4p
Step 6
Divide both sides by (p+2);
t=3-4p/p+2
grouping symbols are important!
't=3-4p/p+2' means this:
im pretty sure you mean 't = (3-4p)/(p+2)'
the part highlighted in your work is the tricky part
good for you for seeing it!
Offline
Step 1
Mult.both sides by 4+t;
p(4+t)=3-2t
Step 1
Mult.both sides by 4+t, assuming 4+t≠0;
p(4+t)=3-2t
Every living thing has no choice but to execute its pre-programmed instructions embedded in it (known as instincts).
But only a human may have the freedom and ability to oppose his natural robotic nature.
But, by opposing it, such a human becomes no more of this world.
Offline
Step 1
Mult.both sides by 4+t, assuming 4+t≠0
if 4+t=0 then original rational is undefined
so nonzero 4+t *is* assumed
Offline
“im pretty sure you meant = (3-4p)/(p+2)'”
Yes. Thanks.
“the part highlighted in your work is the tricky part
good for you for seeing it!”
Thanks. Maths Genie helped, as ever.
Prioritise. Persevere. No pain, no gain.
Offline
Make t the subject of the formula
p=(3-2t)/(4+t)
The left hand side was given in the traditional fraction form, with numerator on top of denominator; this is just the same, yeah, with the slash?
Here's my attempt;
Step 1
Mult.both sides by 4+t;
p(4+t)=3-2t
Step 2
Expand brackets;
4p+pt=3-2t
Step 3
Sub.4p from both sides;
pt=3-2t-4p
Step 4
Add 2t to both sides;
pt+2t=3-4p
Step 5
Factorise left side;
t(p+2)=3-4p
Step 6
Divide both sides by (p+2);
t=3-4p/p+2
Are you seeking help or teaching a mini lesson?
Offline
@sologuitar
"Are you seeking help or teaching a mini lesson?"
Ha! Seeking help, always. And just as well, as I screwed up the final part of the answer. Good old amnkb to the rescue though.
This one was puzzling me for days. It was only after watching Maths Genie I realised you could expand brackets, factorise, etc when rearranging the subject.
Prioritise. Persevere. No pain, no gain.
Offline
@sologuitar
"Are you seeking help or teaching a mini lesson?"
Ha! Seeking help, always. And just as well, as I screwed up the final part of the answer. Good old amnkb to the rescue though.
This one was puzzling me for days. It was only after watching Maths Genie I realised you could expand brackets, factorise, etc when rearranging the subject.
I wonder what amnkb means?
Offline
Pages: 1