Math Is Fun Forum

Jai Ganesh

Administrator

Registered: 2005-06-28

Posts: 48,425

Elliptic curves

An elliptic curve is of the form

y²=x³+ax²+bx+c where a,b, and c  are integers.

When a=0, b=0 and c=-2, the equation becomes

y²=x³-2

Leonard Euler was the first to prove that this equation has only one solution, y=5 and x=3. Thus, he proved that 26 is the only number among the infinity of numbers which is jammed between a perfect square and a perfect cube.

The proof is lengthy and sophisticated even for the present day mathematicians.

The Prince of Mathematicians, Euler, who is belived to have contributed more to mathematics than any other individual was also the first to make amajore breakthrough in proving Fermat's Last theorem. He had proved that

a³+b³ = c³ has no solution where a,b, and c are whole numbers, the only exception being a=b=c=0.

Generations of mathematicians later proved Fermat's Last theorem for certain prime number values of n. It was only during the fag end of the twentieth century that Andrew Wiles finally succeeded in proving Fermat's Last Theorem.

---

It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.

Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.

JaneFairfax

Member

Registered: 2007-02-23

Posts: 6,868

Re: Elliptic curves

Elliptic curves over the field of rationals are related to modular forms – a result which was crucial to the proving of Fermat’s last theorem by Andrew Wiles.

Jai Ganesh

Administrator

Registered: 2005-06-28

Posts: 48,425

Re: Elliptic curves

You're correct, JaneFairfax!

The relation between elliptic curves and modular forms was studied by Yukata Taniyama and Goro Shimura about 10 years after the second world war in Japan leading to the famous Shimura-Taniyama Conjecture on which Andrew Wiles' proof is based.

Go to this link.

---

It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.

Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.

100'

Member

Registered: 2007-12-06

Posts: 8

Re: Elliptic curves

Leonard Euler was the first to prove that this equation has only one solution, y=5 and x=3. Thus, he proved that 26 is the only number among the infinity of numbers which is jammed between a perfect square and a perfect cube.

The proof is lengthy and sophisticated even for the present day mathematicians.

The Prince of Mathematicians, Euler, who is belived to have contributed more to mathematics than any other individual was also the first to make amajore breakthrough in proving Fermat's Last theorem. He had proved that

a³+b³ = c³ has no solution where a,b, and c are whole numbers, the only exception being a=b=c=0.

Generations of mathematicians later proved Fermat's Last theorem for certain prime number values of n. It was only during the fag end of the twentieth century that Andrew Wiles finally succeeded in proving Fermat's Last Theorem.

It was Fermat who proved that 26 is the only number between a perfect square and cube.

Also, the proof that a³ + b³ = c³ has no solutions was only a tiny part of the solution. Find a piece of evidence in an infinity to support a hypothesis (regardless of how hard it was to find) is useless (this has been demonstrated by the Riemann Hypothesis in which millions of zeroes have been found upon Riemanns critical line, not furthering research particularly).

zetafunc

Moderator

Registered: 2014-05-21

Posts: 2,436

Website

Re: Elliptic curves

One can define a "group law" on a cubic (and therefore an elliptic curve, by reducing the cubic to Weierstrass form).

Suppose we have an elliptic curve

, and denote the set of rational points on

by

. Poincaré saw that given three points

on a line, one may form a group law by taking

. That is, to add two points

, we draw a line through

and

and take the third point of intersection to be

. We then reflect

in the x-axis to obtain a new point

. We can then obtain a group law for the set of rational points

and the group operation

. The operation is closed, and it suffices to check that

, that is,

. We take the point at infinity

to be the identity of the group. One can verify associativity in various ways -- one of which is by drawing lots of lines and verifying it geometrically -- and hence we have a group.

Some authors write

instead of

. A nice photo from Wikipedia illustrates this:

Last edited by zetafunc (2016-05-23 19:42:48)

zetafunc

Moderator

Registered: 2014-05-21

Posts: 2,436

Website

Re: Elliptic curves

With a little algebra, we can write a "doubling formula" for a point

. We can obtain a new point

whose co-ordinates are given by:

And hence we can obtain explicit formulae for

,

and so on. (We'll see the importance of this later when we compute torsion subgroups of elliptic curves.)

A natural question to ask is: given the algorithm for finding new rational points in the previous post, how many can we generate? Will we eventually return to our original point, or will this go on forever? It turns out that the answer to both of these questions is yes. If we do return to our original point, then we say that P has finite order, and write

, to mean that P has order n. Such a point is called a torsion point.

If we do not return to our original point, then P is a point of infinite order.

zetafunc

Moderator

Registered: 2014-05-21

Posts: 2,436

Website

Re: Elliptic curves

We denote the set of torsion points -- that is, the set of points of finite order on

-- by

. It turns out that this torsion subgroup is not only a subgroup of E(Q), but it is also finite. The point at infinity

has order 1, by default. We have the following theorem:

The Lutz-Nagell Theorem

Let

have order

. Then:

(a)

(b) If

then

. If

, then

. Thus,

is finite.

We can explicitly write the possibilities Tors(E(Q)) by Mazur's theorem.

Mazur's Theorem

Either

for some

or

, or

for some

.

zetafunc

Moderator

Registered: 2014-05-21

Posts: 2,436

Website

Re: Elliptic curves

Examples of Computing Tors(E(Q))

Let

be an elliptic curve. We compute the discriminant to be

, and note that if we have a point of order k > 2, then by the Lutz-Nagell theorem we must have

. But the only possible values for y in that case are

. But substituting these values of y into E, we see that there are no possible solutions for x over the rationals. Note that if y = 0, then we again have no solutions, so there are no points of order k = 2. Therefore, we only have the trivial point of order 1, the point at infinity,

.

bobbym

bumpkin

From: Bumpkinland

Registered: 2009-04-12

Posts: 109,606

Re: Elliptic curves

Hi;

Do you use the elliptic discriminant http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EllipticDiscriminant.html to get that

---

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.

zetafunc

Moderator

Registered: 2014-05-21

Posts: 2,436

Website

Re: Elliptic curves

Hi,

I am using:

for an elliptic curve

. (in other words, without the multiplication by -16)

thickhead

Member

Registered: 2016-04-16

Posts: 1,086

Re: Elliptic curves

I am surprised to know about elliptic curves of rational numbers and corresponding modular form.

Last edited by thickhead (2016-05-24 00:19:48)

---

{1}Vasudhaiva Kutumakam.{The whole Universe is a family.}
(2)Yatra naaryasthu poojyanthe Ramanthe tatra Devataha
{Gods rejoice at those places where ladies are respected.}

zetafunc

Moderator

Registered: 2014-05-21

Posts: 2,436

Website

Re: Elliptic curves

Another Example of Computing Tors(E(Q))

Let 

  be an elliptic curve. We compute the discriminant to be

, so that if we have a point of order k > 2 on E, then by the Lutz-Nagell theorem we must have

, so the possibilities are

. Substituting these values into E we obtain the following points:

. But using the duplication formula, these cannot be torsion points. Thus, there are no points of order k > 2.

Since a point has order 2 if and only if its y co-ordinate is 0, then we see that

is the only point of order 2. Moreover, as usual, the point at infinity

is also a torsion point (of order 1).

zetafunc

Moderator

Registered: 2014-05-21

Posts: 2,436

Website

Re: Elliptic curves

Height and Elliptic Curves

For a given rational number

where m,n are coprime, define its height to be

. If

denotes the x co-ordinate of a point

, then write

. We take

.

If

is an elliptic curve, define the height of an elliptic curve to be

. From this we can derive the inequality:

A useful consequence: if

satisfies

, then

has infinite order!

zetafunc

Moderator

Registered: 2014-05-21

Posts: 2,436

Website

Re: Elliptic curves

Néron-Tate Height

Suppose we define the height in a slightly different way. Let

, so that the inequality in post #13 implies that

. Replacing

with

and dividing by

, we get:

Summing over k from m+1 to n, we get:

so that we have a Cauchy sequence (and therefore it converges). We call this limit the Néron-Tate height:

zetafunc

Moderator

Registered: 2014-05-21

Posts: 2,436

Website

Re: Elliptic curves

The Weierstrass Elliptic Function

We say a function

is doubly periodic if for some

we have

.

Define the lattice

, and the parallelogram

. Let

.

Define the Eisenstein series of weight k to be:

.

We define the Weierstrass elliptic function as follows:

.

It can be shown that it converges absolutely, is periodic on the lattice and is even. Moreover, any meromorphic,

-periodic function

is a rational function of

and

.

We have an isomorphism of groups:

. Hence, every lattice may be associated with an elliptic curve! (And the converse is true as well.)

zetafunc

Moderator

Registered: 2014-05-21

Posts: 2,436

Website

Re: Elliptic curves

Mordell's Theorem

The group of rational points

is finitely generated, and so can be written as

, where T is a finite torsion subgroup, and r is a non-negative integer. r is called the rank of the elliptic curve E.

zetafunc

Moderator

Registered: 2014-05-21

Posts: 2,436

Website

Re: Elliptic curves

Embedding Torsion in

Theorem: If for a prime

we have

, then

contains a subgroup which is isomorphic to

.

zetafunc

Moderator

Registered: 2014-05-21

Posts: 2,436

Website

Re: Elliptic curves

The j-invariant

Let

be an elliptic curve over

. We define the j-invariant of

to be:

Two elliptic curves are isomorphic over

if they have the same j-invariant.