You are not logged in.
***5
Ok, here goes, maybe a little clumsy and probably not 100% proof, but here goes:
for values of a,b,c greater than or equal to 1:-
If a, b & c all = 1, then (a + 1)^7 * (b+1)^7 * (c+1)^7 = 2,097,152 and 7^7* a^4 * b^4 * c^4 = 823,543
any increase in a,b or c can be viewed simply as a comparison between the functions (a+1)^7 and a^4. For all positive numbers greater than 1, this only increases the divergence. Therefore, it is only necessary to consider values of a,b,c between 0 & 1.
As a,b,c tend to zero, [(a+1)^7....] tends to an minimum value of 1, while [7^7.....] tends to zero. Again, as a,b,c increase above zero, the effect on the comparison is the same as for values above one. Namely, any increase in (a+1)^7 will be greater than the corresponding increase in a^4.
Obviously, negative values would reverse this, but for all positive values, the expression must be true, though I cannot actually see a point at which the expressions could ever be equal!
Offline
ashwil, I shall post the solution to ***3 tomorrow. I was occupied with the other topics today. (Particularly, my post on quotes of mathematicians in 'Members only').
The solution to ***5, as you admitted, is not a 100% proof. You have considered certain values, and I think your reasoning is good, although it does not constitute a mathematical proof. I shall post the proof by the weekend.
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
I'll settle for my reasoning being good. When you don't spend your time actually doing mathematical proofs, you do forget the notation, the methodology and the formulae, but reasoning powers can still get you a long way!
Offline
***5
To simplify it, I'm going to represent a, b, and c by x, because you have to repeat this three times (once for each letter).
Thus, it becomes apparent we must show:
Where
If x < 1, then
Since all of the negative powers of x must be greater than or equal to 1.
The same reasoning goes for x > 2,
But I can't seem to get the numbers in between 1 and 2.
Edit:
How's this for an argument?
The graph
is continuous, above, and never intersects with 94 for all positive values x less than 2. Thus, it must always be greater there.Last edited by Ricky (2006-03-07 07:36:19)
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
Logaritms?
IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.
Offline
Can someone do this:
7(ln(a + 1) + ln(b + 1) + ln(c + 1) - ln 7) ≥ 4ln abc
IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.
Offline
Well done, Ricky!
This was great idea!
Your function has local minimum between 1 and 2 at x=4/3.
IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.
Offline
***5
Something stinks here.
And where's the ricky's post?
IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.
Offline
Let
IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.
Offline
Here's a plot:
Last edited by krassi_holmz (2006-03-07 08:25:44)
IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.
Offline
We need to find the minimum for x>0 (actually we don't need the other side because a,b,c are positive).
How?
Calculus, of course!:
Last edited by krassi_holmz (2006-03-07 08:29:21)
IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.
Offline
The main thing is that f'(x) is factorizible:
IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.
Offline
Ganesh, please reply.
IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.
Offline
Sure, krassi_holmz. The problem is being approached in a much different way than I expected. The solution I had to the problem didn't involve differentiation and maximum/minimum. I shall wait for other responses, particularly from mathsyperson/irspow/John. Please wait for the solution for a day more.
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
But I'm confused about this: f(a)f(b)f(c)>=7^7
Are there a,b,c for which f(a)f(b)f(c)==7^7?
If there are, so I have a mistake.
Last edited by krassi_holmz (2006-03-08 06:02:48)
IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.
Offline
Solution to ***3
Consider the series 3² /1! + 5² /3! + 7² /5! +..........
the nth term = (2n+1)² /(2n-1)! = (4n² +4n+1)/(2n-1)!
= [(2n-1)(2n-2)+10n-1]/(2n-1)! = 1/(2n-3)! + (10n-1)/(2n-1)!
= 1/(2n-3)! + 5. 1/(2n-2)! + 4. 1/(2n-1)!
Sum to n terms would be
Hence the sum to infinity is 1+5e.
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
Many thanks. I had forgotten the technique of considering the nth term. All now clear.
Offline
***6
Prove that
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
***6 beautiful!
Last edited by krassi_holmz (2006-03-08 19:23:57)
IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.
Offline
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
***7
Let
then prove that |z - 7 -9i| = 3√2.
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
***8
Given that p, q are the roots of the equation Ax²-4x+1=0 and r,s are the roots of the equation Bx²-6x-1=0, find the values of A and B if p, r, q, and s are in Harmonic Progression.
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
***9
Show that if a,b>0, then
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
***10
Show that the curves
and cut orthogonally if .It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
***11
Find the value of a such that the vectors
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline