You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
How to do this?
Offline
Hi;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Sorry, that didn't help me..
Offline
Hi Bobbym,
Is it okay to start with the thing we are trying to prove?
'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.'
'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'
I'm not crazy, my mother had me tested.
Offline
Hi;
This is the problem:
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym
I think what Agnishom wanted to ask you is whether it is okay to start the proof with what we want to prove and work our way to a true statement...
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Hi anonimnystefy;
I missed that. I am sorry about that. Bob and I had a good discussion on that and it seems better to work backwards in that case. Even though they do work forwards a lot in inequality books.
Unfortunately, whatever brilliant idea I had about this problem 1 year ago, I can not remember it at all.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hm... I really cannot solve it, I have a vague memory of how I solved it last time but now I don't have a good clue of how...
Offline
I have a very weird solution; you probably won't like it but I'll have a go anyway.
Then
because .Let
.We find
(just). It follows that since the quadratic function is strictly increasing for positive x.The LHS is
and so we are done.Offline
Pages: 1