You are not logged in.
Hey!!!
I want to show that:
That's what I have tried:
When
, it means that:So that
So,
.Is it right so far? Also, how can I show that
?Hello!!!:)
Could you help me at the following exercise?
With how many ways can we choose a man and a woman that are not married to each other from n married couples?
Hi evinda;
It is a handy little calculator is it not?
Yes,it is!
The exact value is 3 / 10, now what did you get for your floating point value?
I got
..Is this right?Is this what you are calculating?
Yes, I calculate the real value of this
and its value as a floating-point number.What is your result?
I found
.Hi evinda;
I am afraid I do not understand what you want. What do you want to check the relative error for?
I found the relative error
but I don't know if the result that I found is right.Hey!!I have a question..
Suppose base=10 , precision t=3, -L=U=10 and
Could you tell me which is the result,so I can check mine?
I think there are 6 of them here, since the difference between the trees will be in which order do you go through the operations (that is, those elements that correspond to P). You can go -+*,-*+,+-*,+*-,*-+ or *+-.
Ok..thank you very much!!!
Hello!!!
Let
But how can I know how many possible parse trees there are?Is there a formula with which I can find the number of all the possible parse trees?
Normalizing the number means to get the mantissa to be a single digit (not zero ) and can be positive or negative.
That is normalized and has 5 significant digits.
But did they want you to nomalize?
Try this handy dandy little calculator:
Great!!!!Thank you so much for your help!!!!!
Hi evinda;
What does t = 5 mean? 5 places? 5 significant digits? An error of .5?
5 significant digits!!!
Hello!!
How can I find the rounding of the number 0.0238095238095,with precision t=5 ?
First I have to find the float number,that is
Since the expression starts with
the first rule for S that we take is ,then from the first rule,we have and then the next rule for S is r ,so we have S -> t+r+S and at the last step we replace S with its rule . Is this the analysis?Or do I have to do something else??Hello!!
Given the following grammar in Chomsky form:
how can I analyze the expression
,based on this Chomsky form?I am not doing that, because that statement is true.
In case you have not read the first post, which seems to be the case, it asks us to prove that, if j is a square number and r an integer, j+i*r is not always a square number.
Ok,I will read it..thank you very much!!!!
You did that with a counterexample. I am not seeing how to do it by contradiction yet.
Ok...Thank you very much for your help!!!
Remember, it sometimes works! Trying to prove that it never does work is bound to fail.
And can't I show that it is not always true?
The great thing about doing numerical mathematics is you do not ever have ask the question, is it right. You did the calculation, you know it is right.
Yes, there are many counterexamples. The assertion is clearly false unless there are more conditions that you have omitted.
Why do you need anymore than that to convince anyone?
I wanted to prove it by contradiction and tried this:
for
Did you find a counterexample?
For
That would do it.
Nice,thank you and,is there also an other way,or is it the only one?
I think you can easily disprove it by a counterexample.
Do you mean that I have to take specific values for j and r?
Hello!!
,where r is>0?
I have a question.
If we know that j is a perfect square,how can we show that j+i*r is not always a perfect square for each i
Can I prove it by contradiction?
Hello!!
I have a question.
If we know that j is a perfect square,how can we show that j+i*r is not always a perfect square for each i
Below is what I am getting.
I got a similar!!! Thank you very much!!!!