You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
differentiate this with respect to x
it seems boring ... help please
ImPo$$!BLe = NoTH!nG
Go DowN DeeP iNTo aNyTHinG U WiLL FinD MaTHeMaTiCs ...
Offline
i think this is the first step ... but maybe there are special way ... because it will take long time to do it with the natural way ...
who can countinue ?
ImPo$$!BLe = NoTH!nG
Go DowN DeeP iNTo aNyTHinG U WiLL FinD MaTHeMaTiCs ...
Offline
i forgot to put the power ( 1 / 2 ) in one of them ...
ImPo$$!BLe = NoTH!nG
Go DowN DeeP iNTo aNyTHinG U WiLL FinD MaTHeMaTiCs ...
Offline
well i dont know about that composite derivitave, do you mean chain rule?
The Beginning Of All Things To End.
The End Of All Things To Come.
Offline
They are in fact the same thing, but stated in different ways.
The composition rule is:
f(x) = g(h(x)), then f'(x) = g'(h(x))*h'(x)
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
they are the same thing though when i first learnt the chain rule, i learnt it int he function notation, then in the above notation.
Last edited by luca-deltodesco (2007-02-13 05:10:40)
The Beginning Of All Things To End.
The End Of All Things To Come.
Offline
thanks alot alot guys ...
ImPo$$!BLe = NoTH!nG
Go DowN DeeP iNTo aNyTHinG U WiLL FinD MaTHeMaTiCs ...
Offline
Pages: 1