You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I have the following equation
Please no trivial answers please.
Offline
Usually non-trivial means m,n,s,t ≠ 0. Any other restrictions on m,n,s,t?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Yes, m,n,s,t ≠ 0. And you cannot just restate the problem.
Offline
If I get it you will not have to worry about that, I do not know what restate the problem means...
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Like, you can't simply say
"The equation is satisfied when
"Because.... well... that's obvious... right?
I'm just looking for simpler cases when both sides are equal.
Last edited by evene (2016-11-05 09:35:34)
Offline
Do you not have to solve for the variables to do that?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
It would help if you provided some background for where this equation came from. A polynomial in 4 variables of degree 6 is not going to be easy to find constraints on, in general.
An obvious solution is m = n = s = t = 1, and you can probably find others quite easily by setting some subset of {m,n,s,t} equal to ±1. Or just set any three of m,n,s,t equal to whatever values you like and solve for the remaining variable. (There will of course be infinitely many solutions if you want to solve over the complex numbers.)
Last edited by zetafunc (2016-11-05 09:45:52)
Offline
So far, I have not heard of any constraints at all. Are they integers, Positive integers, Reals?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
No, you don't have to explicitly solve for m. I just added that, because I thought that solving for m would help find the actual constraint.
Offline
Probably m=n=1 and t=1 may be the minimum restraints to make them equal,unless it is considered trivial.
{1}Vasudhaiva Kutumakam.{The whole Universe is a family.}
(2)Yatra naaryasthu poojyanthe Ramanthe tatra Devataha
{Gods rejoice at those places where ladies are respected.}
Offline
But I don't need values for m,n,s,t. I just want to simplify the above equation...
Offline
Hi;
Simplify? In what sense?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Like... reduce the equation to another equation.
Offline
Pages: 1