You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Can someone explain how
simplifies tothankyou
also another question
how do you find
!Last edited by Identity (2009-07-17 18:58:13)
Offline
The Beginning Of All Things To End.
The End Of All Things To Come.
Offline
Thanks luca!
Offline
Hi identity;
Say
Say:
Substitute for v from above.
Now substittue for u from above.
Last edited by bobbym (2009-07-18 21:52:16)
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
thanks bobbym!
Offline
Hello, Identity!
This is equivalent to bobbym's answer!
.
Offline
I'm wondering how it is equivalent though, I mean like...
If you had
, and you wanted to find x in terms of t, you could solve for x with soroban's answer, but how can you do it with bobbym's?Offline
Hi soroban and identity;
I don't know if the 2 forms are the same.
Can C ever be an independent variable like x?
You can solve for x in terms of t in mine like this:
Last edited by bobbym (2009-07-21 08:25:08)
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
bobbym,
soroban's antiderivative is
Since
Offline
Hi Avon;
Stupid error, I just couldn't see that minus sign. Darn Latex. Thanks for straightening the whole issue out.
Hi identity;
I prefer sorobans solution rather than mine to this problem as it is simpler.
Last edited by bobbym (2009-07-19 22:05:54)
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Thankyou anyway, it is always good to see more approaches to a problem
Offline
Pages: 1